Nevada Taverns or Slots Parlors: The Gaming War of this Roses
Nevada Gaming Commissioner John Moran Jr. concerns a lawyer during a commission conference
The entire point of gaming legislation is to give a solid, dependable and clear framework from which those in the gaming industry can run. So Nevada Gaming Commission members were none too happy when regulations they put in place only two years ago, last year, regarding how slot machines can operate in Nevada’s tavern environment, were back front of them at a recent meeting.
Regulation 3.015 was back home to roost, and laying some eggs.
Not Happy to Revisit Guidelines and Regs
Gaming Commission Chairman Pete Bernhard let it be known he was none too happy to see the issue that is regulatory in front of the commission.
‘ We do not wish to see the guidelines changed every two years. One of this worst things regulators can do is to offer uncertainty. We thought we resolved this issue in 2011,’ Bernhard reiterated.
Creating the revisitation were two different sets of laws from two different regulatory systems, each overlapping the other and creating a set that is murky of for tavern owners to abide by.
In the one hand, Regulation 3.015 ( appears like a James Bond operative code name) was made by the Commission to make slot parlors illegal; the sort exemplified by the plethora of Dottie’s chains found throughout the nevada valley. Competing business operators, because well since the Nevada Resort Association a lobbying group that pushes for its casino clients came ultimately back saying that Dottie’s and their ilk were not really ‘taverns,’ but small slot machine parlors that offered a smattering of snack food and a minimal bar simply so they could pass muster with regulators.