Certainly, underneath the region court’s thinking, just about any “pictorial, visual, and sculptural work” wouldn’t be copyrightable as a “useful article.” an artwork of Lindbergh’s Spirit of St. Louis invites the viewer “to dream and also to allow his / her imagination soar,” and wouldn’t be copyrightable underneath the region court’s approach. Nevertheless the statute plainly promises to extend copyright security to paintings. The region court could have the article that is”useful exclusion ingest the overall guideline, and its particular rationale is wrong. See 1 Nimmer on Copyright Sec. 2.08 [B] at 2-93 letter. 107 (1982).